What Motivates Malign Actors?

Understanding Malignant Intentions: An Overview
Understanding the motivations behind malign actors involves delving into the complex interplay of psychological, social, and political factors that drive individuals or groups to engage in harmful activities. At the core, these motivations often stem from a perceived grievance or unmet need, which may be economic, ideological, social, or personal in nature. Individuals may seek power, control, or financial gain, viewing malicious actions as viable paths to achieve these ends. [012]
Ideological motivations are particularly potent, with actors feeling driven by dogmas or beliefs that justify their behavior as a means to a ‘greater good’ or to rectify perceived injustices. In many instances, individuals are influenced by group dynamics, where belonging to a community with shared objectives can reinforce and amplify these malignant intents. [34]
Additionally, personal factors such as a desire for recognition, revenge, or a sense of belonging can contribute significantly, with some actors using malign activities to assert their identity or retaliate against those they hold responsible for personal setbacks. Psychological predispositions, including tendencies toward narcissism or aggression, can further color these motivations. Understanding these varied and often intertwined motivations is crucial for developing effective strategies to predict, counteract, and mitigate the actions of malign actors, as it helps to not only address the immediate threats but also the underlying causes fostering such malicious intent. [560]
Psychological Drivers Behind Malign Behavior
Understanding the psychological drivers behind malign behavior reveals complex layers of motives that compel individuals to engage in destructive or harmful actions. At the core of these drivers is often a deep-seated sense of grievance or perceived injustice, which may lead individuals to retaliate against systems or communities they feel have wronged them. This sense of injustice can fuel feelings of anger, resentment, and hostility, which act as catalysts for malign actions. [07]
Furthermore, personal insecurities and a desire for power or control can motivate individuals to assert dominance in harmful ways. The need to feel significant or compensate for perceived inadequacies can drive some to resort to extreme measures. [08]
In certain cases, ideology or radical beliefs play a pivotal role, offering a sense of identity and belonging that fuels a justifiable framework for malign actions. These belief systems can create an “us versus them” mentality, dehumanizing perceived enemies and vindicating violent or harmful behavior as a form of justified retribution or self-defense. The influence of social pressures and group dynamics should not be underestimated, as individuals seeking acceptance or approval may engage in malign acts to align with group norms or to emulate leaders they admire. [910]
Ultimately, the psychological drivers behind malign behavior are multifaceted, intertwining personal, social, and ideological elements to propel individuals towards harmful actions.
Socioeconomic Factors Contributing To Malign Actions
Socioeconomic factors play a significant role in motivating malign actors by creating environments where criminal behaviors can flourish. Economic deprivation often drives individuals to resort to illegal activities as a means of survival, especially when legal opportunities are scarce or inaccessible. High unemployment rates, coupled with inadequate social safety nets, can lead to desperation, compelling individuals to engage in activities they might otherwise avoid. [7]
The lack of economic opportunities can breed frustration and a sense of hopelessness, leading individuals to perceive malign actions as their only viable option to achieve economic security or social status. Additionally, socioeconomic inequalities can fuel resentment toward wealthier individuals or groups, prompting malign actors to commit crimes as acts of rebellion or retribution against perceived injustice. [11]
Furthermore, educational disparities contribute to the perpetuation of malign actions. Limited access to quality education can hinder social mobility, trapping individuals in cycles of poverty. Without the skills and knowledge to access better opportunities, some may find themselves drawn to criminal organizations that promise financial gain. These organizations often exploit vulnerable individuals by providing economic incentives, thereby perpetuating a cycle of malign behavior. [125]
In communities with stark socioeconomic inequalities, malign actors may also emerge as community figures or leaders, using their illicit activities to gain influence and control, further embedding criminality within the social fabric. Thus, addressing these socioeconomic disparities is crucial in mitigating the motivations that drive malign actions. [13]
Ideological Influences And Their Role In Malign Activities
Ideological influences play a significant role in motivating malign actors as they provide a framework for justifying harmful activities and a narrative that legitimizes destructive behavior. Ideologies, whether political, religious, or social, often serve to radicalize individuals by framing their actions as noble or necessary in the pursuit of a perceived higher goal. This commitment to an ideology can blind adherents to the consequences of their actions, fostering an environment where unethical or violent methods are deemed acceptable, or even obligatory, to achieve a desired outcome. [141516]
In some cases, actors are driven by a belief system that promises a transformative future, often characterized by dramatic societal change or the eradication of perceived enemies. This can lead to individuals and groups engaging in subversive or violent activities to accelerate the arrival of this envisaged future. The conviction that they are part of a struggle against an oppressive or corrupt system can further cement their resolve.
Moreover, the group dynamic and shared beliefs within ideological communities can solidify a sense of identity and belonging, reinforcing members’ commitment to malign activities. This collective identity is powerful, offering individuals not only a sense of purpose but also a supportive network that validates and encourages their actions, reinforcing their alignment with the group’s destructive objectives. [16]
The Impact Of Power And Control On Malignant Motivations
The impact of power and control on malignant motivations is profound and often central to the actions of malign actors. Those who seek to exert dominion over others may be driven by a desire not only to achieve their immediate objectives but also to reinforce their status and influence within a particular social or organizational hierarchy. Power, in this context, becomes both a means and an end. [617]
The quest for control may stem from various sources, such as insecurity, past grievances, or an innate thirst for dominance. This pursuit can manifest in different ways, ranging from overt aggression and manipulation to more subtle forms of coercion and persuasion. Malign actors often perceive power as a finite resource, leading to a zero-sum mindset where their gain is inextricably linked to another’s loss. [01018]
This belief can catalyze destructive behaviors, as these individuals or groups attempt to consolidate their authority, often justifying harmful actions as necessary for maintaining order or achieving ‘greater good’ objectives. Moreover, once a degree of control is established, sustaining it becomes imperative. The fear of losing power can drive malign actors to increasingly extreme measures, entrenching their motivations further and creating a cycle that perpetuates and escalates their destructive influence. [0]
This dynamic underscores the complexity and danger inherent in the motivations of power-seeking malign actors.
Cyber Maliciousness: A Unique Set Of Motivations
Cyber maliciousness is driven by a complex tapestry of motives unique to the digital realm. Unlike traditional criminal activities, the virtual world offers anonymity, a global reach, and a relatively low risk of immediate apprehension, creating a fertile ground for diverse motivations. Financial gain is a primary driver, as cybercriminals exploit vulnerabilities to steal sensitive information, demand ransoms, or engage in fraudulent schemes. [192021]
The potential for significant financial rewards, with cryptocurrencies enabling untraceable transactions, fuels these activities. However, the motivations extend beyond financial incentives. [1522]
Ideological and political motives play a crucial role as well. Hacktivists engage in cyberattacks to promote their beliefs, disrupt organizations, or draw attention to societal issues, leveraging the internet’s power to amplify their message. State-sponsored actors exploit cyber tools for espionage, to disrupt adversaries, or to assert geopolitical dominance, blending malicious intent with strategic governmental objectives. Additionally, personal vendettas, professional rivalries, or the mere thrill of causing chaos can drive individuals to perpetrate cyberattacks. [230143]
The absence of a physical presence in cyberspace emboldens perpetrators, allowing them to explore malicious endeavors they might otherwise avoid in the physical world. Ultimately, the motivations behind cyber maliciousness are as diverse as the actors themselves, reflecting a unique interplay of personal, financial, ideological, and geopolitical factors in the modern digital landscape. [2425]

 References

[0] “Inside the Hacker’s Mind: Analyzing the Psychology Behind Cyber Attacks Leading To Data Breaches – PrivacyEnd.” privacyend.com, 22. Jan. 2024, https://www.privacyend.com/psychology-behind-cyber-attacks-leading-data-breaches/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[1] “Cyber Security Threats – All you need to know about Types and Sources.” dataguard.com, 01. Feb. 2024, https://www.dataguard.com/cyber-security/threats/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[2] “Understanding Cybercriminals: Motivations, Methods and Protection Strategies.” vgminsurance.com, 04. Oct. 2024, https://www.vgminsurance.com/blog/post/understanding-cybercriminals-motivations-methods-and-protection-strategies. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[3] “What are the motives behind cybercrimes? – Chill Cyber Security.” chillcybersecurity.co.uk, 22. June 2024, https://www.chillcybersecurity.co.uk/what-are-the-motives-behind-cybercrimes/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[4] “WHAT IS A MALIGNANT NARCISSIST – My Hidden Scars.” myhiddenscars.com, 20. July 2024, https://myhiddenscars.com/what-is-a-malignant-narcissist/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[5] “The Psychology of Cybercriminals: Understanding Motivations and Behavior | MoldStud.” moldstud.com, 22. Jan. 2024, https://moldstud.com/articles/p-the-psychology-of-cybercriminals-understanding-motivations-and-behavior. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[6] “Malignant Narcissism.” womensmentalhealthpodcast.com, 17. July 2024, https://www.womensmentalhealthpodcast.com/blog/malignant-narcissism/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[7] “Counter-Terrorism Module 2 Key Issues: Drivers of Violent Extremism.” unodc.org, 25. Jan. 2018, https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/terrorism/module-2/key-issues/drivers-of-violent-extremism.html. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[8] “What Is A Malignant Narcissist? Symptoms & What to Know.” westgawellnesscenter.com, 22. May 2025, https://westgawellnesscenter.com/malignant-narcissist/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[9] “Science and Ideology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” iep.utm.edu, 15. Apr. 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/sci-ideo/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[10] “Female Malignant Narcissist Traits: Recognizing Destructive Patterns.” neurolaunch.com, 06. Dec. 2024, https://neurolaunch.com/female-malignant-narcissist-traits/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[11] “Cruel, Immoral Behavior Is Not Mental Illness.” psychiatrictimes.com, 24. Feb. 2020, https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/cruel-immoral-behavior-not-mental-illness. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[12] “Understanding the Motivations and Goals of Cyber Attackers: A Guide for Security Practitioners.” startupdefense.io, 01. June 2023, https://www.startupdefense.io/blog/understanding-the-motivations-and-goals-of-cyber-attackers-a-guide-for-security-practitioners. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[13] “The Case for Socioeconomic-Based Affirmative Action – Federal Bar Association.” fedbar.org, 19. Jan. 2025, https://www.fedbar.org/blog/the-case-for-socioeconomic-based-affirmative-action/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[14] “Understanding Cyber Threat Actors: Types and Motivations.” pentestwizard.com, 18. June 2024, https://pentestwizard.com/understanding-cyber-threat-actors/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[15] “Exploring the Psychology Behind Cyber Attacks | GCS Network.” globalcybersecuritynetwork.com, 13. Nov. 2024, https://globalcybersecuritynetwork.com/blog/the-psychology-behind-cyber-attacks/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[16] “A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking – PMC.” pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 01. Mar. 2022, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274788/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[17] “Understanding Social Hierarchies: The Neural and Psychological Foundations of Status Perception – PMC.” pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 20. Feb. 2015, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5494206/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[18] “Malignant Narcissist: Symptoms, Treatments, and Tips.” helpguide.org, 21. Apr. 2025, https://www.helpguide.org/mental-health/personality-disorders/malignant-narcissist. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[19] “Exploring the Psychology of Cyber Attacks: The Attacker’s Mind | Institute of Data.” institutedata.com, 21. June 2024, https://www.institutedata.com/us/blog/the-psychology-of-cyber-attacks/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[20] “The Psychology of Cyber Attacks: Understanding Motivations and Behaviors – Penetra Cybersecurity.” penetracyber.com, 08. May 2024, https://penetracyber.com/the-psychology-of-cyber-attacks-understanding-motivations-and-behaviors/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[21] “How to Identify the Motive Behind Your Cyber Threat Adversary? – NetSecurity.com.” netsecurity.com, 10. Feb. 2023, https://www.netsecurity.com/how-to-identify-the-motive-behind-your-cyber-threat-adversary/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[22] “Hacker Subcultures: Unmasking the Motivations and Methods – SecurityScorecard.” securityscorecard.com, 01. July 2024, https://securityscorecard.com/blog/hacker-subcultures-unmasking-the-motivations-and-methods/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[23] “Political Ideology Decoded: What Really Drives Party Beliefs and Voter Loyalty?.” politicalmarketer.com, 12. June 2025, https://politicalmarketer.com/aspects-of-political-ideology/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[24] “The Psychology of Cybercrime: Understanding Motivations to Craft Effective Prevention Strategies – Cybersecurity Education Initiative.” cysed.org, 18. May 2025, https://cysed.org/the-psychology-of-cybercrime-understanding-motivations-to-craft-effective-prevention-strategies/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.
[25] “Motivations for Hackers to launch Cyber Attacks – Cybersecurity Insiders.” cybersecurity-insiders.com, 26. Mar. 2025, https://www.cybersecurity-insiders.com/motivations-for-hackers-to-launch-cyber-attacks/. Accessed 12. Jun 2025.



Creativity Linked to Increased Alpha

Creativity is integral to many aspects of life, from being an effective problem solver to a good artist, but the brain function underlying this important trait is not well understood. A study published in Neuroscience uses EEG (electroencephalogram) technology to explore which brain regions are active during creative thinking.

Consider the Source




An Augmentation Ministry

When Jesus gave us a promised helper, the Spirit of Truth, he made it possible for us to enjoy his presence continuously. This gift, from the Way, the Truth, and the Life is fully capable of leading us; along the Way, into all Truth, so that we may enjoy the most abundant Life possible; just as the Master said. Those who put Jesus on the cross to die thought that his influential presence would somehow be diminished when, in fact, his ministry has been augmented by the spirit complement that indwells and also envelopes us.

There are those who would usurp the authority of the Spirit. They are the great pretenders, that habitually elevate their personal evaluations, to the level of absolutes. They may think they’re justified while attacking the underpinnings of another person’s faith. They might feel as though they are qualified to perform the equivalent of psychological or theological surgery on the souls of others. And they might presume to impose their individually circumscribed and personalized science, philosophy and religion on our brothers and sisters.

Jesus did not call us to remove anything from the hearts and minds of our siblings. He instead demonstrated how we may put ennobling truths into the minds and hearts of humankind. These truths are usually found, in a highly concentrated form, within the parables Jesus shared with his disciples and the Apostles. Today, I offer for your consideration, a contemporary parable that focuses on the quality of such concentration.

If you have ever known someone that suffers from depression, or if you have experienced it personally, you probably know something of what is sometimes called the binocular trick. This analogy is used to describe habit where the individual magnifies or exaggerates problems, while they demagnify, disqualify, or minimize their blessings. Just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, perceived blessings and curses may be as well.

A lens is a concentrator. In the case of telescopes it also serves as a light gathering device. The first person to apply for a patent for a telescope was Dutch eyeglass maker Hans Lippershey. In 1608, he laid claim to a device that could magnify objects three times. His telescope had a concave eyepiece aligned with a convex objective lens. One story goes that he got the idea for his design after observing two children in his shop holding up two lenses that made a distant weather vane appear close. Others claimed at the time that he stole the design from another eyeglass maker, Zacharias Jansen.

Jansen and Lippershey lived in the same town and both worked on making optical instruments. Scholars generally argue, however, that there is no real evidence that Lippershey did not develop his telescope independently. Lippershey, therefore, gets the credit for the telescope, because of the patent application, while Jansen is credited with inventing the compound microscope. Both appear to have contributed to the development of both instruments.

Adding to the confusion, yet another Dutchman, Jacob Metius, applied for a patent for a telescope a few weeks after Lippershey. The government of the Netherlands turned down both applications because of the counterclaims. Also, officials said the device was easy to reproduce, making it difficult to patent. In the end, Metius got a small reward, but the government paid Lippershey a handsome fee to make copies of his telescope.

In 1609, Galileo Galilei heard about the “Dutch perspective glasses” and within days had designed a scope of his own — without ever seeing one. He made some improvements — his creation could magnify objects 20 times — and presented his device to the Venetian Senate. The Senate, in turn, set him up for life as a lecturer at the University of Padua and doubled his salary, according to Stillman Drake in his book “Galileo at Work. Legend has it that Galileo was the first to point a telescope skyward. He was able to make out mountains and craters on the moon, as well as a ribbon of diffuse light arching across the sky — the Milky Way. He also discovered the rings of Saturn, sunspots and four of Jupiter’s moons.

A parable is, in essence, the means to convey truth to people with a wide variety of capacities to comprehend. In substance a parable is also known as a parabolic analogy. It is called that because it is analogous to the way a lens, an acoustically tuned amphitheater, or a satellite dish makes use of curvature and forms a directing arc to concentrate the light, the sound, or the radio waves on some target.

There are three kinds of light: physical light, intellectual insight, and spirit luminosity. Jesus, the master story teller, made use of the narrative’s directing arc to focus us on the truth of the matter. When we read these stories we make use of physical light to enhance our intellectual insight. When we are responsive to the Spirit of Truth’s divine leading, our spirit luminosity brings the components of truth: the facts, meanings, and values into precise focus.




Attitudinal and Behavioral Blasphemy

One of the greatest embarrassments to the faith is the masquerade. Those feigning reverence for all that Jesus taught and exemplified, while harboring attitudes and engaging in behaviors that make a mockery of those same ideals, are doing far more damage than good. This is Lucifer’s legacy. For the self-proclaimed God of Liberty has advanced an unbridled and fraudulent form of liberty that is, first and foremost, characterized by contempt for all things true, beautiful, and good.

The first casualty as a result of the Luciferian sophistries occurred within the minds of those with an exaggerated sense of self-importance. Narcissism is clearly incompatible with Divine Truth. This was brought home in our recent history as Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Propaganda Minister, advanced the deception of his day. He said; “If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.” 

Once a person is fully vested in the lie, they are not likely to depart from it. And Goebbels addressed this with his description of just how the lie runs deep within the mind of the psychopath. On this he said; “Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.”

Goebbelian tactics are focused on the more animalistic among us. The emotionally charged and intellectually stunted are ripe for exploitation. Goebbels put it this way; “There was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the stronger, and this will always be “the man in the street.” Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology.”

As to the target demographic, likely to embrace his message, Goebbels zeroed in even further saying; “…the rank and file are usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious.” He elaborated further on the nature of the message with a warning; “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”

Goebbels revealed much about how the church and the state, together with the religious and political discourse of our time can be turned to resemble the arrogant effrontery displayed by Lucifer in the Court of Heaven. For Goebbels said: “We enter parliament in order to supply ourselves, in the arsenal of democracy, with its own weapons. If democracy is so stupid as to give us free tickets and salaries for this bear’s work, that is its affair. We do not come as friends, nor even as neutrals. We come as enemies. As the wolf bursts into the flock, so we come.”

Today’s insurrectionists are Goebbelian fundamentalists. They turn a deaf ear to the Jesusonian warning that “He who lives by the sword dies by the sword.” Instead they embrace the prescription offered by Goebbels when he said: “The masses need something that will give them a thrill of horror.” He also observed that “propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.” 

The FIBS tactic of leveraging Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry, and Smear is a huge part of the Luciferian legacy and nowhere was it better articulated than within the Nazi propaganda machine. Goebbels focused on the street saying “Whoever can conquer the street will one day conquer the state, for every form of power politics and any dictatorship-run state has its roots in the street.”

Consider the politics of today in light of Goebbels proclamation that “We shall reach our goal, when we have the power to laugh as we destroy, as we smash, whatever was sacred to us as tradition, as education, and as human affection.”

Jesus famously said “By their fruits you shall know them.” We know the animalistic hoards that stormed the United States Capitol on January the 6th in 2021 produce the kind of strange fruit that Billie Holliday recorded a song about in 1939. She sang of a “pastoral scene of the gallant South – The bulgin’ eyes and the twisted mouth – Scent of magnolias sweet and fresh – Then the sudden smell of burnin’ flesh.”

John Wycliffe, for his translation of the Bible into Middle English, prefaced his work by writing “The Bible is about government of, by, and for the people.” Since that time counterfeit Christians have paid lip service to this essential biblical principle. They feign an affinity for democracy. And yet, the idea of a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and multi-racial democracy terrifies them. This is why the first casualty resulting from the Lucifer Rebellion was truth.

Jesus said: “This is my command, that you love one another as I have loved you.” Authentic Christians should take note. When we have such clear instructions from our Mission Commander, we need look no further for a clear and concise Mission Statement.